Home News Law & Policy MAPPS demands reforms in USGS

MAPPS demands reforms in USGS

Reston, US: “There is a critical need to refocus the mission and priorities of the United States Geological Survey (USGS), and to align its budget with this new direction,” John Palatiello, Executive Director, Management Association for Private Photogrammetric Surveyors (MAPPS), told a subcommittee of the US House of Representatives.
 
In addition, Palatiello said, “The National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI), established by President Clinton and reaffirmed by President Bush provides a framework for the geographic information America needs today. However, this priority is not reflected in the USGS budget. We are surprised and deeply disappointed that funding for NSDI is proposed to be cut in the President’s FY 2012 budget by USD 3.5 million.”

“This is the last place we should be cutting the USGS budget. A reduction in partnerships will result in more duplication, less coordination, less leveraging of scarce resources,” he added, citing USGS’s own analysis that for every dollar in funds appropriated to USGS for NSDI framework data, more than USD 11 in partnership dollars is leveraged. He also opposed “the proposed decrease in funding for the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) by USD 200,000.”

“The USGS operates primarily under authorisation provided by the Act of March 3, 1879. It has been decades since Congress last enacted major surveying and mapping legislation for USGS. As a result, surveying and mapping has proliferated among more than 40 federal agencies, resulting in duplication, a lack of coordination, gaps in coverage and the absence of a strategic approach to providing the basic geographic information needed in the 21st century. The need for better coordination of Federal surveying and mapping activities has been well documented,” Palatiello stated.

“On the bright side,” Palatiello said, “we are pleased the budget request includes an increase, or reallocation, of USD 48 million to support the current and future mission of the National Land Imaging Program, principally through LANDSAT. The moderate resolution data provided by LANDSAT does not compete with the private sector and is an appropriate government investment. It provides for data that is primarily used in research and scientific applications, much of it funded by the government, which complements higher resolution satellite and airborne capabilities available from the private sector. This funding by the Obama Administration continues implementation of the ‘Future of Land Imaging’ program initiated in the Bush Administration. We support this bipartisan program. MAPPS supports the increase, or reallocation, of USD 48 million to support the NLIP, principally through LANDSAT. The bipartisan program provides government funding for satellites that will ensures data continuity, which compliments higher resolution satellite and airborne capabilities from the private sector.”

“The USGS was once the envy of the world for its leadership in the mapping and geographic information field,” Palatiello said. “We look forward to working with the Subcommittee on this important and long-overdue review and reform of USGS’s mapping and geospatial activities so it can once again be a leader.”

Palatiello’s testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy and Mineral Resources of the House Committee on Natural Resources entitled “Examine the Spending Priorities and the Missions of the U.S. Geological Survey and the President’s FY 2012 Budget Proposal.” The testimony and the archived webcast of the hearing can be viewed at https://naturalresources.house.gov/Calendar/EventSingle.aspx?EventID=226891.

Source: MAPPS