Home Land Administration Indian tribals go high-tech to claim forest land

Indian tribals go high-tech to claim forest land

India: Tribal families living near the Shoolpaneshwar Wildlife Sanctuary in Narmada and in parts of the Dangs district are using GPS technology and satellite maps to stake claim to over 10,000 plots of land under the Forest Rights Act.

“We carry these GPS devices, turn it on and ask the claimant to walk on the border of his fields,” explained Bamanjibhai Vasava, a member of the local Forest Rights Committee (FRC) in Patholi Ganina village, where more than 500 tribals from 22 villages, all located inside the 607.70-sqkm sanctuary, gathered at a mud and bamboo long-house for a meeting to finalise their claims.

“The data is then super-imposed on satellite maps, and we can see which areas are being cultivated by people. These maps, names of claimants and other details are then submitted to the government as evidence that we have been cultivating these lands, so we can gain possession under the Forest Rights Act,” Bamanjibhai said.

As per Forest Rights Act, a local cultivating a plot of forest land since 2005 can stake his claim for the land.

Indrasinh Vasava, an FRC member in nearby Singal Garan village, said, “The GPS has to connect with a satellite, so when there are clouds, it does not work. We carry out surveys when there are no clouds.”

Technology is not alien to the region where farming is largely for sustenance and tribals routinely migrate to Surat for daily-wage work, where none have attended college, where electricity supply is erratic and tribals have to climb nearby hills to catch fleeting cellphone signals from a mobile tower in faraway Dediapada town every time they need to make a call.

The large-scale use of technology by tribals is partly because of the fact that the state government has authorised use of satellite imagery as evidence to support claims under the Forest Rights Act, and the subsequent errors it itself committed.

BISAG (Bhaskaracharya Institute for Space Applications and Geo-informatics) was tasked with acquiring satellite images and preparing maps, but a petition currently heard by the Gujarat High Court has alleged that these initial BISAG maps were “highly error-prone,” without latitude/longitude grids and with markings off by 300 metres or more on the ground. Even re-done maps were not verified with ground surveys, petitioners alleged.

The government has not denied the mistakes in BISAG maps in court, stating instead they can be revised and corrected.

Eventually, 1.13 lakh FRA claims (out of 1.56 lakh) were rejected, and mass protests have led to a review being ordered.

Meanwhile, a point of argument in the case is whether Google Earth images can be relied on by the government instead of maps provided by its own institute.

Exercising caution, groups assisting tribals with FRA claims they have now acquired the same maps that BISAG acquired from ISRO’s National Remote Sensing Centre in Hyderabad, and are marking claimed plots on these as well.

Source: Indian Express