Simulating firest degradation : Apling the
Area Product1on Model 1n the Ka11 Konto area 1n
East Java, Indonesia1
Alfred de Gier and Yousif Ali Hussin
International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences
(ITC)Enschede The Netherlands
Fax: +31 53 874399
E-mail: [email protected]
Forests cover large areas of the global land surface. For many developed and developing countries, they represent an important source for their economies. Due to the growing need for more agricultural land, more and more forests are under the risk of degradation and disappearance. To safeguard forests from extinction, alternative food production strategies need to be developed, while at the same time proper management of the forest resources is required. All this requires information on land use and its changes, and on the people who engage in these processes. This information is important to those who are responsible for forest and land use policy development, and to those engaged in land use planning and management.
The Area Production Model (APM) permits the simulation of future land use changes in response to population growth, changes in gross domestic product, and in agricultural productivity. The model was developed for the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations by Nilsson in 1984. The model is used for long-term scenario development and analysis. In its original form, the APM is numerical (and graphical) in data requirements and output. This paper shows that the Area Production Model can be used for the simulation of forest degradation in an area in East Java, Indonesia, using a combination of multitemporal aerial photograph, satellite and field data.
Tropical deforestation is one of the major concerns today. Current deforestation rates are estimated to be about 15.4 million ha per year (FAO, 1994) .However, forest degradation, as a result of unsustainable human activities, affects an even larger area of forest annually.
The importance of forests is well recognized by governments worldwide, as reflected in the “Forest principles” that were adopted by the UNCED conference in 1992. Foresters and all other land users and land use planners should therefore find ways to control, stop, and even reverse this process. Politicians are supposed to decide on and implement the required institutional measures. Given the speed of the process, two issues are clear: actions are needed without undue delay, and a sustainable effect of such actions can be expected only if the causes of the problem are tackled. The problem thus needs to be examined from a cause-effect point of view.
The major cause of forest destruction is the need for more agricultural land, which itself is largely a consequence of rapid population growth and rising economic expectations. This means that the major function of forest land is that of donor for agricultural land. In addition, the need for timber, fuelwood and cash also influence forest destruction. These
causes should therefore be approached from a perspective of land and its .products, and the increasing demands for it. Since, in principle, demand for more agricultural land (at least in part) could be met from non forest land, not only forest land but also the agricultural lands in the area should be included. However, the need for more agricultural products not only can be met by bringing more land under cultivation, but also by .increasing the productivity of existing agricultural land, i.e., by ‘ intensifying agricultural land use.
The development of the Area Production Model (APM) (FAO, 1986a) has been an important step in simulating land use changes, by varying the input .variables. The APM is intended for simulation of long-term land use changes and the prediction of primary and secondary yields from agricultural and forest lands. One of the major features of the APM is its capability to simulate the future need for agricultural land. The p model’s demand and supply scenarios for agricultural products and land r are generated primarily by the growth rates of population and GDP, and by changes in land productivity. The model is comprehensive, but does not have excessive data requirements.
The model uses three different agricultural classes:
Land for sussistence crop (used mainly for home consumption )
- land for market crops (produced mainly for the local markets)
- land for cash crops (destined primarily for markets outside the area) .
An important aspect of the APM is the concept of land allocation. If demand for land in a particular class increases, transfers of land from another class to that one are generated by the model. Only when the donor class concerned is exhausted, land from another class is transferred, and so on. The sequence of the donor land use transfer classes is specified by the APM user. Forest land is commonly the last land donor.
The model has been tested in East Java, Indonesia and in Rachabury Province, Thailand (FAO, 1986a and 1986b) and in two parts of Peru .(APODESA, 1989) .In the three cases, tropical forest areas were included. The conclusions were that the model was adequate and sufficiently adaptable for extension as well as modification. The original FORTRAN version was later converted to LOTUS 123 (Williams 1987) .
The APM requires numerical data input. Its output is in tabular and graphic form. Spatial data are neither required nor produced. The APM is r therefore insensitive to the location where the need for more land exists, and to the location of the donor land use class from which land : is to be transferred. This is considered a major limitation, because it -is not possible to predict where the land for the specific classes will be needed, and where the land of the relevant donor class is located. Furthermore, a spatial model would allow to grade accessibility to , potential donor land, by using friction coefficients. It could also simulate the locational effects of decisions that influence the need for .land transfer.
De Gier and Hussin (1993) described how the spatial component was developed and succesfully linked to the model for the Kali Konto area in , east Java, Indonesia. All spatial data used were in digital form. The results of this spatial implementation show the suitability of GIS for combining the spatial component and the numerical output from the APM.
Further enhancement of the spatial version was desired, to accomodate multi-temporal spatial data of transfer processes as they occur in reality. The outcome of this would then be used to calibrate the model, .and would allow the determination of key operators. The test site was the,
Kall Konto area (Flgure 1), a sub-watershed of the Kali Brantas watershed : in East Java, Indonesia, for which multi-temporal data were available.
The Kali Konto sub-watershed covers some 23,500 ha, of which about 15,685 ,. ha are classified as forest land, owned by the state. The elevation : varies between 620 m and 2650 m a.s.l. The existing forest consists of natural stands
and plantations which are mostly for protection and preservation. 1991, the population of ,more than 100, 000 people lived in
villages outside the forest land .About 75 percent of them were small farmers and. laborers. They crave land since they are unskilled for work otherthan in agriculture. About half of. the labour force is unemployed or under-employed.
Figure 1 The location of the Kali Konto area
Wood is an important commodity in the rural areas. It is used as fuel in households and small industries, and as poles for housing. An unknown number of (mostly landless) people gain their income by illegal cutting and selling fuelwood from the nearby forests. This process has led to severe degradation of the natural forests in many parts. According to Project Kali Konto (PKK, 1984) , forest is defined as land that has a tree crown cover of more than 20 percent; scrub has a tree. ‘ crown cover of 20 percent or less. The latter can include failed or abandoned plantations. In 1979, the proportion of scrub land was 18 percent.,;
Unlike forest lands outside Java, conversion of state forest lands to non-forestry purposes is not allowed by law. In the field, the state ‘ forest land boundary is separated from privately owned village land by clearly visible concrete boundary-posts. Land transfer from forest to agricultural land (as predicted by the APM) will in reality not occur forest land remains forest land even if the forest cover changes.
There is very limited non-forest land available for transfer to agriculture land. The easiest way for the landless and the poor people in this area to satisfy their basic needs is to go to the forest, cut the trees, and sell them for timber or fuelwood. The income is used to buy food and other goods. This compensates their need for agricultural land, but at the same time causes degradation of the forests, and ultimately leads to scrub land. It follows that population growth in the Kali Konto area does not lead to new agricultural land, but to scrub land.
The main aim of this paper was to determine whether there is a relationship between the amount of new agricultural land as calculated by the APM over a given period of time and the actual increase in area of scrub land in the same period. If this relationship exists, the APM can help forest “‘ policy makers to anticipate future forest degradation, and to suggest timely action