Home Articles Integrating GIS with web for public participation

Integrating GIS with web for public participation

Samir Banger
DP – Engineer, Hope Technologies, New Delhi, India.

Introduction
A Geographic Information System (GIS) is an organized collection of computer hardware, software, geographic data, and personnel designed to efficiently capture, store, update, manipulate, analyze, and display many forms of geographically referenced information (ESRI, 1995). GIS has been widely used in solving a variety of planning problems. Together with the use of the Word Wide Web (WWW), GIS could be further developed to allow many more people to have access to GIS functionality and to enhance community participation in planning. Public participation is an approach in which public is brought to play an active role in planning process by its early stages. The major concern is to use GIS as a tool for communication between different interest groups like planners, decision makers and public.

The rapid growth of the Internet provide highly customized, accessible, and interactive source of public information and is changing the ways that people capture and manipulate spatial information. It is expected that the implementation of Web-based GIS could provide interactive mapping and spatial analysis capabilities for enhancing public participation and collaboration in decision-making processes. A public participation approach situates GIS analytical tools within an expanded framework of communication and discourse, opening opportunities for public participation (NCGIA, 1996). “Public Participation GIS” (PPGIS) is conceived broadly as an integrative and inclusive process-based set of methods and technologies amenable to public participation, multiple viewpoints, and diverse forms of information (Krygier, 1997a). Technological developments have made PPGIS possible only recently (Krygier, 1997b). Little is known about the technologies and theories that will enable such participatory activities. What role do the Internet and WWW play as effective media for public participation? What are the technical, practical, and theoretical issues raised in providing access to database and GIS tools relevant to particular decision problems? Moreover, as the need to expand the access to spatial information for participatory kinds of activity and personal use increases, more and more researchers are recognizing the need for a new kind of GIS (Nyerges and Barndt, 1997).

Web-Based GIS
The Internet and Web-based GIS is an effective medium for PPGIS. However, Web-based GIS is not a single technology. These technologies related Web-based GIS include Object-Oriented Language, GIS package and language, HTML, CGI, and the theories about PPGIS.

It is important to define the different forms of Web-based GIS, before selecting a appropriate for any given application. There are currently five forms of Web-based GIS applications (Pima County CAD/GIS, 1997):

  1. Graphic Snapshots of pre-generated maps
  2. Spatial Database Catalogs and Libraries
  3. Map Generators
  4. Real-time Map Browsers
  5. Real-time Maps and Images

Public Participation In GIS
Increased public involvement in the definition and analysis of questions tied to location and geography is the domain of Public Participation GIS (PPGIS). This approach facilitates the meaningful introduction of appropriate forms of spatial information and related technologies for widening public participation in the Policy making process (NCGIA 1996). This participant driven framework should be capable of representing diverse views without forcing premature resolution of contradictions, inconsistencies and disputed as they arise.

Contexts for introducing PPGIS would include community economic development, environmental dispute resolution, participatory planning, and other activities involving public collaboration. Technologies chosen or developed to support this approach can be designed to document and record the problem resolution process, allowing evolving priorities and problem definitions to be tracked by all participants. Sandman (1993) has identified nine publics relevant to discussion about community problems. The publics include: neighbors, concerned citizens, technical experts, media, activists, elected officials, business and industry, and local, state and federal government regulators (Nyerges and Barndt, 1997). A public participation approach would situate GIS analytical tools within an expanded framework of communication and discourse, opening opportunities for public participation across the processes of problem definition and problem resolution (NCGIA, 1996).

Recent discussions presented at the NCGIA Initiative 19 specialists’ meeting (GIS and Society) and at the annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers have identified a set of questions concerning future development of the tools of spatial analysis in relation to their public context. Similar themes were addressed at NCGIA Initiative 17 (Collaborative Spatial Decision-Making). The discussions of PPGIS have been directed toward various of partial outcomes, such as the development of more user-friendly interfaces, network access to GIS, use of GIS as a communications medium, data creation based on local knowledge and sketch map capacity, public access to digital data archives, and the inclusion of groups often marginalized by the costs or expertise requirements of information technology (NCGIA, 1996).

State of the art Web-based GIS technology can play an important part in the development of PPGIS and Personal GIS (Nyerges and Barndt, 1997). Moreover, PPGIS and Personal GIS would be capable of managing and integrating all data components and participant contributions from one interface. Components would include e-mail, access to data archives, presentation of parallel texts and counter texts in diverse media, real-time data analysis, standard base maps and data sets, sketch map and field note capabilities (Schroeder, 1995).

The Methods of Web-Based GIS

How does Web-based GIS Work
There are many different products that can be used to implement Web-based GIS as described in section. They include MapGuide, MapObjects, ProServer, GeoMedia Web Map, Spatial WebBroker, APPIAN “Carta”, Spatial Net and CARIS Internet Server.

Web-based GIS users can use a Web browser to navigate maps and do basic spatial analysis. A user enters specifications such as location, thematic layers, or searching requests on the web page to set up the environment for mapping or searching. Users can also click buttons to start display commands such as zoom in, zoom out, identify, pan, query, etc. The requests from user will be sent to clients by way of HTML forms. The form is passed to the web server. A gateway at the web server passes the request to a GIS server. For instance, the gateway could pass the request in the form of HTML to a MapObjects Internet Map Server. The MapObjects Internet Map Server (ESRI, 1996a) then generates a graphic file that will be converted to a GIF image or JPEG image. The GIF or JPEG image is later sent back to the client and viewed by the users with a standard web browser.

The basic series of steps is:

  1. Create the form.
  2. Pass the arguments to a script (CGI).

After receiving requests the server will then:

  1. Process the spatial analysis or Mapping request.
  2. Make the necessary map and translate it to a BMP file.
  3. Translate the BMP file to JPEG or GIF file.
  4. Serve the image and data listing by HTML.

Currently, two varieties of raster image formats are widely supported on the World Wide Web: CompuServe’s popular Graphic Interchange Format (GIF) and the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) based format JFIF. The ESRI Web Link ActiveX control ships with methods to convert Windows bitmap files-exported by the Map control-into either of these two formats. The WebLink control method BMP2GIF generates a GIF file given a source BMP file and similarly, the method BMP2JPEG generates a JFIF format JPEG file. Both of these formats greatly reduce the size of the image data through compression and thus reduce the time required to send the data across the Internet. The technologies related to the Web-based GIS applications include Object-Oriented Language, GIS package and language, HTML, and CGI. To create a Web-based GIS application, the programmers should have knowledge of the software packages described above.

There are two topics that deserve further research. It is important to consider how to get support to cover the costs of hardware, software, programmers, and staff to maintain a Web-based GIS site. A Web-based GIS site for public participation could be supported by universities or government agencies, or with federal, state, local or private grants. The other issue for further research is assessing the impact of PPGIS on communities.

Conclusion
The future of Internet GIS is bright and brimming with opportunities. There will be opportunities to reduce operating expenses by, among other things, accessing and paying for GIS functionality on an ‘as needed’ basis through a cable and not having to invest in the technology overkill of boxed desktop products. We will find opportunities to increase productivity not only by placing friendly GIS interfaces at the disposal of novice users, but by placing it in their palm computers, as well. Smart companies with fast deployment tools will extend GIS-based service to their staff who will use these applications to retain customers more predictably.

All these opportunities are now appearing alongside the adoption of distributed, intelligent architectures combined with effective tools for development. And when offered with client interfaces that make GIS easy to use for everyone, the result is a vivid reminder of the power of GIS. The power of geographic analysis, matched with distributed computing’s power to increase the return on huge investments in spatial data by putting information in the hands of millions, will make a difference.

The tendency seems to be that there is more and more enabling technologies available for implementing public participation methodologies. Computer and World Wide Web literacy is also improving rapidly. It is apparent that the institutional issues are the hardest ones. How open are planning and decision making processes going to be in future? What information is to be released to the public? How can genuine communication between planner, decision maker and public be achieved? Are public willing to participate? Although some experimental work has been carried out in these areas, many more real life projects and much more empirical research is necessary.

References:

  • ESRI, 1995. Understanding GIS- The ARC/INFO Method. GeoInformation International, UK: pp1-2.
  • ESRI, 1996a. Getting Started with MapObjects Internet Map Server. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Red Land, California.
  • ESRI, 1996b. MapObjects-GIS and Mapping Components Programmer’s Reference. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Red Land, CA.
  • ESRI, 1996c. MapObjects- Building Applications with MapObjects. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Red Land, California.
  • Huxhold, W. 1991. An Introduction to Urban Geographic Information Systems. Oxford University Press, New York: p.p. 58.
  • Krygier J. B. 1997a. Buffalo’s Lower West Side: WWW Project. https://www.geog.buffalo.edu/~jkrygier/krygier_html/lws/lws.html
  • Krygier J. B. 1997b. Project Proposal- Methods for Interactive Mapping and Geographical Information Systems via the World Wide Web. Research Development Fund.
  • Maguire, D. J. 1994, “What is an object-oriented GIS?” Proceeding of the Fourteenth Annual ESRI User Conference. p.p. 74-89.
  • NCGIA, Univ. of Maine. 1996. PPGIS Workshop Background:
  • Nyerges T. and Barndt M. 1997. Public Participation Geographic Information Systems, Proceedings of Auto Carto 13, Seattle, WA.
  • Pima County CAD/GIS, 1997.Developing GIS for the Web: https://www.gis.pima.gov/webdev/
  • Shibley, Robert G. 1994. The Lower West Side- Strategies for Neighborhood and Community Development. The Urban Design Project, School of Architecture and Planning, SUNY at Buffalo and The residents and businesses of the Lower West Side of Buffalo.
  • Schroeder, P. 1995. Criteria for the Design of A GIS/2. Discussions at the NCGIA I-19 Specialists’ Meeting: .
  • Langaas, Sindre. 1996.Commercial, off-the-shelf solutions for GIS – WWW interfacing: .
  • Zhan, Feibing, and Mark, D. 1992.”Object-oriented Spatial Knowledge Representation and Processing: Formalization of Core Classes and Their Relationships.” Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling. p.p. 2:662-671.